The Editor, Sir:

The article, 'Review body completes first public libel forum' (Gleaner, January 17), which was held at the Northern Caribbean University (NCU) in Mandeville, highlighted the need for change which was cited by the participants at the forum.

A need for more public dialogue before the laws are revised was also mentioned. It was also believed that the time for consultation was too short.

The law of libel and slander, which is what is being discussed, is really more complex than one may think. Therefore, any revision that is to be done should reflect clarity and freedom to inform and educate the public in an informed manner by not only the media as cited, but by all reliable and commendable sources.

A law that was gazetted as far back as 1851 scarcely relates to current issues or situations and could easily land the user (s) in trouble he/she did not intend to cause.

Republish old laws

I humbly suggest that the old gazetted laws be republished for the public's information and review before the public debate begins.

This would enable more people who have an interest in the matter to participate, leading to a more comprehensive understanding of the present defects and what the amendments should be, with the hope of giving strength to the application of such laws.

If this republication could be done before the next forum meets in Kingston, it might be a great help.

I am, etc.,

ROSE DEWAR

Christiana, Manchester