Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Profiles in Medicine
More News
The Star
Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
1998 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Careers
Library
Power 106FM
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News

Walker answers to EOJ financial irregularities
published: Wednesday | May 7, 2008

A day after resigning as director of elections, Danville Walker yesterday appeared before the Public Accounts Committee of Parliament (PAC) to answer to reports of breaches at the Electoral Office of Jamaica (EOJ) as outlined in auditor general's most recent report.

Walker sought to explain why at the time of his examination, the auditor general was not presented with the required financial statements from as far back as 2003 and why there were discrepancies with regards to salary payments to two officers.

The PAC was told that due to the absence of the financial statements, a properly audited assessment of the EOJ's accounts could not be conducted.

Walker in defence, said the outstanding financial statements for 2003/2004 and 2004/2005 were submitted on February 18, after the auditor general conducted his examination.

He also said the financial statements for 2006/2007 should be ready within the next three months.

Change in accounting system

Walker also said the financial statements were not prepared on time because of a change in the EOJ's internal accounting system and because of the preparations for general elections.

The auditor general's report also outlined other shortcomings at the EOJ, which included the unauthorised payments to officers amounting to more than $200,000.

Walker, who was the director of elections for 10 years, said in one instance, a contract officer was employed to implement the electronic identification of voters in preparation for the 2003 local government elections.

The officer, who left the EOJ in December 2004, was paid more than $115,000, which is outside the salary scale for the post.

Walker said the EOJ needed the officer, who was knowledgeable and experienced in implementing the electronic voter identification programme.

He said, too, that based on the officer's educational background and expertise, he deserved the remuneration.

Other duties

Another officer was paid for duties he performed in addition to his regular duties between October 2002 and June 2005.

In settlement, the Ministry of Finance, whose approval was sought for the allowance paid to the officer, has agreed that 25 per cent of the overpaid amount, or $121,386.37, is to be repaid in 36 monthly instalments.

The repayment started in October 2006 and will end September 2009.

More Lead Stories



Print this Page

Letters to the Editor

Most Popular Stories






© Copyright 1997-2008 Gleaner Company Ltd.
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions | Add our RSS feed
Home - Jamaica Gleaner