Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Profiles in Medicine
More News
The Star
Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
1998 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Careers
Library
Power 106FM
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News

Scarce benefits in question - Education payouts concerns auditor general
published: Wednesday | February 6, 2008

Edmond Campbell, News Coordinator

The approval of more than $500,000 in education benefits to two persons, one, a close relative of a former project officer in the Social, Economic and Support Programme (SESP) unit, has led the Auditor General's Department to raise concerns of nepotism by the officer involved.

The payments were made to the beneficiaries between 2005 and 2006.

Acting Auditor General Pamela Munroe Ellis raised the matter yesterday during the first sitting of Parliament's Public Accounts Committee (PAC), chaired by Dr Omar Davies, Opposition spokesman on finance.

The PAC chairman demanded a report on the matter, which should be presented at next Tuesday's sitting.

Addressing the PAC, Munroe Ellis said her department was not convinced that due process was carried out before the benefits were awarded.

A former project officer of the SESP unit approved an education benefit amounting to $158,000 to a close relative.

Transaction subject to scrutiny

The acting auditor general said there was no indication that the transaction had been subject to scrutiny from a senior officer.

It was reported that the former project officer also approved an education grant totalling $432,000 to another beneficiary.

In both cases, the disbursements were made to a commercial bank and transferred to the account held by the project officer, instead of being paid directly to the educational institutions.

The auditor general said both amounts were subsequently remitted to the bank accounts of the beneficiaries.

Munroe Ellis said the awarding of the benefit to a relative of a project officer was a conflict of duty.

The Social Development Commission (SDC), which implements the SESP programme, and the Office of the Prime Minister (OPM), under whose portfolio the SDC, now falls, were in the hot seat in Parliament yesterday.

Executive Director of the SDC, Robert Bryan, said the entire transaction was carried out without the direct input of the commission.

"We receive instructions as to who the beneficiaries are and the instructions for payment," he said.

OPM Director General Devon Rowe told members of the PAC that an investigation was ordered in January last year into the two payments.

He told the PAC that the project officer was no longer working with the SESP unit.

Rowe said in another six weeks, the investigation would be completed.

However, Davies insisted that a report be presented to the PAC by next week.

edmond.campbell@gleanerjm.com

More Lead Stories



Print this Page

Letters to the Editor

Most Popular Stories






© Copyright 1997-2008 Gleaner Company Ltd.
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions | Add our RSS feed
Home - Jamaica Gleaner