Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
What's Cooking
More News
The Star
Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
1998 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Careers
Library
Power 106FM
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News

Bittersweet day for Seaga - Loses Privy Council appeal
published: Thursday | January 31, 2008

Howard Campbell, Gleaner Writer


Former Prime Minister Edward Seaga. File

THE PRIVY Council in Britain yesterday upheld a Court of Appeal ruling that former Jamaica Labour Party (JLP) leader, Edward Seaga, should pay former Deputy Commissioner of Police Leslie Harper J$1.5 million for defamation of character.

Lord Carswell, who delivered the ruling, said the Privy Council is "in agreement with the conclusions reached by the judge (Justice Patrick Brooks) on liability, rather than those of the Court of Appeal".

Lawyers for Harper said his reputation was damaged by statements made by Seaga at a public forum in March 1996. There, the former prime minister challenged government's plans to replace Trevor MacMillan with Harper as police commissioner.

Seaga claimed that Harper was a supporter of the ruling People's National Party. Harper denied this and promptly sued the JLP leader for slander.

In December 2003, Supreme Court judge Justice Patrick Brooks ordered Seaga to pay Mr. Harper $3.5 million. Seaga then took his case to the Court of Appeal which upheld the decision in December 2005, but reduced the award to $1.5 million.

Qualified privilege

Seaga turned to the Privy Council in January 2006. His lawyers argued that he had had 'qualified privilege' when he spoke at the Wyndham Kingston Hotel on March 6, 1996; they said he had a duty as Opposition Leader to warn the public of Harper's perceived bias.

The Privy Council disagreed, saying, "It is in their Lordships' view that the appellant knew and intended at the time of publication that his words should receive such wide publicity."

Lord Anthony Gifford, who represented Harper, said the Privy Council's stance was a warning to public speakers.

"It means whether you are a journalist or politician, whenever you make allegations you'll have to take reasonable care," Gifford told The Gleaner.

Raymond Clough, who argued the case for Seaga alongside R.N.A. Henriques, said he (Clough) was "naturally disappointed".

"I thought we had a strong enough case to win," Clough said.

Harper, who served the Jamaica Constabulary Force for 36 years, could not be reached for comment.

More Lead Stories



Print this Page

Letters to the Editor

Most Popular Stories






© Copyright 1997-2008 Gleaner Company Ltd.
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions | Add our RSS feed
Home - Jamaica Gleaner