Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Arts &Leisure
Outlook
In Focus
Social
International
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
1998 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Library
Live Radio
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News

Celebrating Independence ... through community building
published: Sunday | July 16, 2006


Robert Buddan, Contributor

JAMAICA ENTERED its Festival/Independence celebration season in June. Occasions like Independence should cause us to reassess, each year, where we are as a country, and what we need to do to get to where we want to be.

It is heartening to know, for instance, that murder declined by 41 per cent this June compared to last June. The police say this is due, among other things, to better cooperation between police and citizens.

Any progress in trust and confidence in the relations between the public and national institutions is good.

Crime and violence are the greatest concern of Jamaicans, and the fact that the murder rate has regularly declined by 20 per cent to 40 per cent per month since January is one of the best news to celebrate at independence.

DEMOCRATIC COMMUNITY BUILDING

Independence works best when people have trust and confidence in their national institutions.

According to the leading Caribbean researcher on crime and justice, Professor Anthony Harriot of the Department of Government, the solution is to change the way we do policing and invent new ways to administer justice by making both more community-sensitive and supportive of community peace building.

Tony Harriot believes the evidence for success is there. In 1998, a community truce in Western Kingston was the primary cause of a 50 per cent reduction of murders there.

He believes that community-based initiatives between people and police can bring murders down by 40 per cent nationally, and more effective policing could bring it down by another 12 to 15 per cent, even if there are no short-term improvements in the economy.

In other words, it is within the power of the people in communities and the police force to bring the murder rate down to half of what it is. Improvements in the economy would be necessary to sustain these efforts and will bring the murder rate down even more.

From that proposition, I would go further to say we should, therefore, broaden the model of community policing and extend it to other areas of institutional life. There is a more general disconnect between citizens and government agencies, political parties, the business sector, and even the churches.

We should, therefore, aim to improve levels of peaceful voter participation in national and internal party elections, size of party membership, and participation in constituency management; community-based shareholdership, lease ownership, and contracting arrangements with government and private businesses; levels of moral and social activism in churches, PTAs, Neighbourhood Watch Committees, and peace management programmes.

HUMANITY OVER BRUTALITY

Other organisations can learn from the community-policing model, which became mandatory training at all levels of the police since 1998. It seeks to emphasise professionalism, problem solving and partnerships.

It has made many areas like Red Hills Road, Payne Land, and Grants Pen less volatile and improved community-police relations.

The police from the Fletcher's Land community advise members of the force to be respectful, tactful and tolerant when dealing with the public.

This is good advice for all institutions that have presence throughout our communities.

The police force, maligned for so long, could teach other institutions much of what it has learned. Those organisations that often stress police brutality should also admit to the other side of policing - police humanity.

Democratic policing is humanising. In one police-citizens dialogue in Fletcher's Land, citizens admitted that the police often performed parenting roles and resolved issues without having to arrest anyone.

They intervene in disputes and counsel young people and adults. They often warn persons guilty of petty offences first and make arrests only if those persons repeat their illegal acts.

They sometimes provide parenting and counselling services even when they are off duty. They encourage young people to take part in sports and other socially healthy activities.

MAKE A DIFFERENCE

Political parties, also much maligned, can make a similar difference in the communities. Parties need to practise more community-based autonomy over centralised management.

The PNP's North West St. James Executive has now shown the way. It has launched a humane community-building initiative by opening a bank account for the relatives of five recently-slain persons in Norwood.

But it also plans to open a skills training centre, a citizens' advice bureau, a park, and a dispute resolution centre for the community. This is exactly the kind of initiative that regional and local party organisations can replicate across the island in order to make parties a part of the communities in which they have and owe their roots.

The business sector is often criticised for being aloof towards the communities from which they profit. They don't have to be.

Our local chambers of commerce must replicate the initiative of the American Chamber of Commerce that helped to transform Grants Pen from a volatile area into what is now viewed as a model of community policing. Chambers of commerce across the parishes should do likewise.

International development agencies also make a difference. USAID has funded a three-year inner-city development programme in Grants Pen.

In fact, it says that the success of the programme has caused the U.S. Congress to change its mind and allow USAID to work with local police forces around the world, something U.S. law had prohibited. The UNDP's Civic Dialogue programme is also commendable.

Communities themselves, especially garrison communities, are criticised for encouraging and protecting gunmen. They, too, have a responsibility to change and there is evidence of this happening.

Residents of March Pen Road, the police, civic groups, religious organisations, and the Social Development Commission have worked out a six-month programme to convert a new truce into a lasting peace. Its initiatives include promoting unity, jobs, infrastructure, better shelter, better relations with the police, and ending the 'garrison' stigma attached to the community.

MODELS FOR PARTNERSHIP

These developments invite more institutional partnerships if the early successes are to be consolidated. The state, political parties, trade unions, the Church, and business organisations have the deepest and strongest historical roots in society.

They exist at national, regional, and local district levels. They must borrow from the community-policing model to build trust and confidence in our national institutions. Their philosophy should be the same as that of community policing - building trust and confidence through partnerships with citizens.

The methods should be similar - dialogue, collaboration, participation, mutual respect.

The facilitators could be the same - USAID, UNDP's Civic Dialogue, American Chamber of Commerce, the Dispute Resolution Foundation, the Community Security Initiative, the Social Development Commission, the Peace Management Initiative, the Jamaica Social Evaluation Project (JASPEV) and its idea of a Charter of Collaboration that brings many government agencies into the commitments.

COMMUNITY LEADERSHIP

Models of development agree on some basics: the need for an integrated, multi-sectoral, holistic approach; the importance of trust and partnership between citizens and society's institutions; and the necessity of integrating communities into national strategies for development.

What we now need is the institutional depth to reach into the communities in ways that meet these conditions and 'best practices'.

I am convinced that the community leadership exists. The true test of a country's independence is the extent to which its people can, through their own efforts, organise their lives and control their destiny.

To achieve this, more of our institutional leaders in the communities need to understand the essential lesson of the generation of leaders who won independence, the lesson of self-help.

Robert Buddan is a lecturer in the department of government at the University of the West Indies. Email robert.buddan@uwimona.edu.jm.



APOLOGY

Robert Buddan’s piece in the Sunday Gleaner dated June 25, 2006 captioned “Reneto Adams Policing The Badlands of Jamaica” stated that Jamaicans For Justice in conjunction with other government and private organizations have amassed more resources to convict Mr. Adams than any other individual in Jamaica’s history. The article also contained a statement the thrust of which was that Jamaicans For Justice had joined with criminals in a joint enterprise to convict Reneto Adams.

The Gleaner Company Limited is satisfied that the above statements are false.

Although Jamaicans For Justice publicly commented on the Adams trial, at no time did the organization amass resources to convict Mr. Adams.

The Gleaner Company unreservedly apologizes for publishing the above statements made in the article and for any impression that might have been left in the minds of the public that Jamaicans For Justice was in any way connected to criminals.

We apologize for the publication of the statements and for any embarrassment and inconvenience which it may have caused Jamaicans For Justice.

The Gleaner Company disassociates itself from the comments made in the article which were offensive to Jamaicans For Justice.

In apologizing for the publication of the statement, we regret any embarrassment and inconvenience which it may have caused Jamaicans For Justice.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

APOLOGY

Robert Buddan’s piece in the Sunday Gleaner dated June 25, 2006 captioned “Reneto Adams Policing The Badlands of Jamaica” stated that Families Against State Terrorism (FAST) in conjunction with other government and private organizations have amassed more resources to convict Mr. Adams than any other individual in Jamaica’s history and made a statement the thrust of which was that Families Against State Terrorism had joined with criminals in a joint enterprise to convict Reneto Adams.

The Gleaner Company Limited is satisfied that the above statements are false.

Families Against State Terrorism although publicly commenting on the Adams’ trial at no time amassed resources to convict Mr. Adams.

The Gleaner Company unreservedly apologizes for publishing the above statements made in the article and for any impression that might have been left in the minds of the public that Families Against State Terrorism was in any way connected to criminals.

We apologize for the publication of the statements and for any embarrassment and inconvenience which it may have caused FAST.

The Gleaner Company disassociates itself from the comments made in the article which offended FAST.

In apologizing for the publication of the statement, we regret any embarrassment and inconvenience which it may have caused FAST.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

APOLOGY

THE ARTICLE by Robert Buddan, a lecturer in the Department of Government at the University of the West Indies, published in The Sunday Gleaner dated June 25, captioned 'Reneto Adams policing the badlands of Jamaica', stated that the Farquharson Institute of Public Affairs, in conjunction with other government and private organisations have amassed more resources to convict Mr. Adams than any other individual in Jamaica's history. The article further made a statement, the thrust of which was that the Farquharson Institute had joined with criminals in a joint enterprise to convict Senior Superintendent of Police Reneto Adams.

The Gleaner Company Limited is satisfied that the above statements are false; in fact the Farquharson Institute of Public Affairs has at no time made any statements abut the Adams trial, nor have they been involved in any way in the prosecution of Reneto Adams.

The Gleaner Company unreservedly apologises for publishing the statements made in the article and for any impression that might have been left in the minds of the public that the Farquharson Institute of Public Affairs was in any way connected to criminals, or joined with others to influence the course of justice.

The Gleaner Company disassociates itself from the comments made in the article which offended the Farquharson Institute of Public Affairs. We wish to assure it and members of the public that we continue to hold the institute in high esteem. In apologising for the publication of the statement, we regret any embarrassment and inconvenience it may have caused the Institute.

More In Focus



Print this Page

Letters to the Editor

Most Popular Stories





© Copyright 1997-2006 Gleaner Company Ltd.
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions | Add our RSS feed
Home - Jamaica Gleaner