Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
The Shipping Industry
Lifestyle
Caribbean
International
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
1998 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Library
Live Radio
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News

Seaga takes libel case to Privy Council
published: Tuesday | January 31, 2006

FORMER OPPOSITION Leader Edward Seaga has been granted leave to appeal to the United Kingdom Privy Council against a Court of Appeal ruling that he should pay retired Deputy Commissioner of Police Leslie Harper damages for slander.

The Supreme Court had awarded Mr. Harper, who is an attorney-at-law, $3.5 million in damages. However, in December last year, the Court of Appeal reduced the amount to $1.5 million.

The Court of Appeal held that the damages were excessive because Mr. Harper did not claim he had suffered in his post because of the slander.

In his defence, Mr. Seaga had claimed qualified privilege but the Court of Appeal upheld the decision of Mr. Justice Brooks that qualified privilege did not apply.

The Court of Appeal also agreed with Mr. Justice Brooks that Mr. Harper was defamed in his capacity as deputy commissioner of police.

Mr. Harper had filed the suit claiming that Mr. Seaga defamed his character at a Jamaica Labour Party meeting at a hotel in St. Andrew on March 6, 1996.

Mr. Seaga claims he has a real chance of success in his appeal. He contended yesterday in his application for leave to appeal that, in his defence of qualified privilege, Mr. Harper did not file a response claiming there was malice. He said Mr. Justice Brooks applied a media libel test which the Court of Appeal found to be wrong but found other grounds on which to uphold the Supreme Court ruling.

More Lead Stories



Print this Page

Letters to the Editor

Most Popular Stories




































© Copyright 1997-2005 Gleaner Company Ltd.
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions | Add our RSS feed
Home - Jamaica Gleaner