Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Farmer's Weekly
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
1998 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Library
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Other News
Stabroek News

That UTech protest
published: Saturday | March 12, 2005

SURELY STUDENTS at the University of Technology can find a better way to show their displeasure with the administration than to block the gates as they did yesterday, denying access and exit to people having legitimate business at the St. Andrew campus.

The blocking of gates by students has become all too common a feature, and a very bad one at that, demonstrating an inability to find better ways to pressure specific administrations to address students' concerns.

At the centre of yesterday's protest is the delay by the UTech administration in presenting students with grades from exams sat last December. The administration has admitted to failing to meet its deadline of implementing an Integrated Students Administrative system, which would allow students to get their grades online. By resorting to the old method of printing out the reports, the presentation of the grades has been further delayed.

The students' fears are hinged on the impact the delay will have on their ability to access scholarships, do re-sits and obtain loans from the Students' Loan Bureau, if necessary. These are legitimate concerns and the university's administration can rightly be severely criticised for its communications snafu. Once they realised there would be more problems in meeting the deadline, and knowing of the previously expressed concerns, the administration should have been more pro-active in alerting the students and attempting to defuse the tension.

It is even arguable that the students are correct that it should not have to take nearly three months to have results ready. But the answer is not to inconvenience everybody else.

While civil disobedience is a time-honoured practice all over the world, in far in too many instances, persons who have localised grievances believe that its their right to prevent others from going about their business. We hardly expect students at the tertiary level to ape rabble-rousing behaviour that hardly accomplishes anything. Often the very act of civil unrest only pushes back further, the processes already begun to address the concerns.

We trust that the UTech administration will learn the appropriate lessons and the need to keep the avenues of communication open and that the students will seek creative means of circumventing some of the obstacles they see in relation to their plans for graduation and loans. One of the lessons they should learn is that the journey to their intended destination is not always smooth. People have to learn how to circumvent obstacles without creating more.

THE OPINIONS ON THIS PAGE, EXCEPT FOR THE ABOVE, DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF THE GLEANER.

More Commentary | | Print this Page















© Copyright 1997-2004 Gleaner Company Ltd. | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions
Home - Jamaica Gleaner