Monday | July 16, 2001

Home Page
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Flair
Star Page

E-Financial Gleaner

Subscribe
Classifieds
Guest Book
Submit Letter
The Gleaner Co.
Advertising
Search

Go-Shopping
Question
Business Directory
Free Mail
Overseas Gleaner & Star
Kingston Live - Via Go-Jamaica's Web Cam atop the Gleaner Building, Down Town, Kingston
Discover Jamaica
Go-Chat
Go-Jamaica Screen Savers
Inns of Jamaica
Personals
Find a Jamaican
5-day Weather Forecast
Book A Vacation
Search the Web!

Dabdoub for court today


Dabdoub

THE COURT of Appeal will have an expedited hearing today in a motion brought by Attorney-at-law Abe Dabdoub, who is challenging Solicitor-General Michael Hylton's opinion that he should not be sworn in as Member of Parliament for North East St. Catherine until an appeal filed by Phyllis Mitchell has been heard and determined.

R.N.A. Henriques, Q.C., who is representing Mr. Dabdoub, the JLP candidate who Justice Basil Reid declared winner of the constituency on June 29, reversing the 1997 General Election result, will be asking the Court of Appeal to determine if there is a stay of execution of the court order in place.

The Court of Appeal, comprising President the Hon. Ian Forte, Justice Ransford Langrin and Justice Clarence Walker, is being asked to clarify the purported stay of execution pending the hearing of Mrs. Mitchell's appeal.

Lawyers representing Mrs. Mitchell, the PNP candidate, last week withdrew their summons in the Supreme Court for a stay of Justice Reid's order pending the determination of the appeal. The summons was withdrawn on the ground of advice from the Solicitor-General that once an appeal was filed in an election petition, it operated as a stay of execution.

Mr. Dabdoub's lawyers will be arguing that there is now no stay of execution in place because only the court can grant a stay. They will also be arguing that the 1967 case of Brown vs. The Trelawny Parish Council, on which the Solicitor-General based his opinion, is irrelevant and therefore cannot be relied on as a precedent.

It is also being contended that when Mrs. Mitchell's lawyers withdrew the summons, they circumvented the process of the court and relied on the opinion of a member of the Executive (the Solicitor-General).

Back to Lead Stories


























In Association with AandE.com

©Copyright 2000 Gleaner Company Ltd. | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions